Imagine you are standing in an open field, pulling back the pouch of a catapult. As you stretch the thick rubber cord, you can feel the tension building up. You are doing work against the elastic forces of the rubber, and all that effort is being stored inside the cord as Elastic Potential Energy.
When you finally let go, the cord snaps back to its original length, transferring all that pent-up energy into the stone. The stone shoots forward, now possessing Kinetic Energy. This beautiful conversion of energy is the core principle we will use to solve this problem.
The Master Equation
Conservation of Energy
By the principle of conservation of energy, assuming no energy is lost to heat or sound, the elastic potential energy stored in the stretched cord must equal the kinetic energy gained by the stone.
We know the formula for the kinetic energy of the stone is simply 21mv2. But what about the elastic potential energy of the cord? For a stretched wire or cord, the energy stored is given by:
U=21×Stress×Strain×Volume
Unpacking the Elasticity Terms
To find the Young's modulus (Y), we need to express Stress and Strain in terms of Y and the physical dimensions of the cord. According to Hooke's Law:
We also know that Strain is the fractional change in length, LΔL. The volume of the cord is its cross-sectional area multiplied by its original length, A⋅L. Substituting these into our potential energy formula gives:
U=21(YLΔL)(LΔL)(A⋅L)=2LYA(ΔL)2
Equating and Solving for Young's Modulus
Now, let's bring our energy conservation equation back and equate the two energies:
We can elegantly cancel the 21 from both sides. Rearranging the equation to isolate our target variable, Young's modulus (Y), we get:
The Final Calculation
Before we plug in the numbers, let's calculate the cross-sectional area A. The diameter is given as 6 mm, which means the radius r=3 mm=3×10−3 m.
A=πr2=π(3×10−3)2=9π×10−6 m2
Now, we substitute all the given values into our master equation for Y:
Y=9π×10−6×(0.2)20.02×(20)2×0.42
Y=9π×10−6×0.040.02×400×0.42
Y=1.13×10−63.36≈2.97×106 Nm−2
The calculated value is approximately 3×106 Nm−2. Looking at the given options, the closest order of magnitude is 106 Nm−2. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. The physics of a simple toy reveals the profound material properties hidden within it!