Visualizing the State Change
Imagine a sturdy cylinder fitted with a movable piston. Inside this cylinder, we have trapped exactly 5 moles of an ideal gas.
Initially, the gas is resting at a cool temperature of 100 K.
Now, we slowly and reversibly push the piston down, compressing the gas. As we do work on the gas, its temperature rises, eventually reaching 200 K. This is our physical setup.
Calculating Internal Energy Change
The first thing we need to determine is the change in the internal energy of the gas, denoted by ΔU.
For an ideal gas, the internal energy is a direct reflection of its temperature. There are no intermolecular forces to worry about, so the energy is purely kinetic.
Because of this, the change in internal energy depends only on the change in temperature, regardless of what happens to the pressure or volume. The master formula we use is:
Here, n is the number of moles, CV is the molar heat capacity at constant volume, and ΔT is the change in temperature.
Let's plug in our known values. We have n=5 mol, CV=28 JK−1mol−1, and our temperature change ΔT is (200−100) K.
Converting this to kilojoules, we get our first crucial result:
The Ideal Gas Law and pV Change
Next, we need to find the change in the product of pressure and volume, Δ(pV).
At first glance, this might seem tricky because we don't know the initial or final pressures or volumes. However, we have a powerful tool at our disposal: the Ideal Gas Equation.
Since the amount of gas n and the gas constant R are fixed, any change in the pV product must be directly proportional to the change in temperature.
Therefore, we can write:
This elegant substitution saves us from needing to know the individual pressures and volumes.
Let's substitute the values provided in the problem. We use n=5 mol, the given R=8.0 JK−1mol−1, and ΔT=100 K.
Converting to kilojoules, we find:
Conclusion
By systematically applying the principles of thermodynamics and the ideal gas law, we have successfully determined both required quantities.
The change in internal energy is 14 kJ, and the change in the pV product is 4 kJ.
This perfectly matches option (c), confirming our analytical approach.