Animated Solution for Mathematics - Definite Integration: 48∫3/233/29−4x2dx is equal to
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Analyze the Integral
Given integral: 48∫2234339−4x2dx
Objective: Evaluate the definite integral using standard trigonometric substitution or identities.
Identify the core form: ∫a2−(mx)2dx
Standard Integral Form
The integrand resembles the standard form: ∫a2−x2dx
The formula for this is: sin−1(ax)+C
To use this, we must make the coefficient of x2 exactly 1.
Factoring the Denominator
Factor out 4 from the expression inside the square root:
9−4x2=4(49−x2)
Taking 4 out of the root gives 2: 2(23)2−x2
Simplifying the Integral
Substitute the simplified denominator back into the integral:
∫2(23)2−x248dx
The constants simplify: 248=24
New integral: 24∫(23)2−x2dx
Applying the Formula
Now apply the standard formula: ∫a2−x2dx=sin−1(ax)
Here, a=23.
The integrated function is: 24[sin−1(23x)]
Which simplifies to: 24[sin−1(32x)]
Upper Limit Substitution
The upper limit is x=433.
Substitute into 32x: 32⋅433=23
The upper limit term becomes: sin−1(23)
Lower Limit Substitution
The lower limit is x=223.
Substitute into 32x: 32⋅223=21
The lower limit term becomes: sin−1(21)
Evaluating Inverse Trigonometry
Recall standard trigonometric angles:
sin−1(23)=3π
sin−1(21)=4π
The expression is now: 24(3π−4π)
Final Calculation
Calculate the difference: 3π−4π=124π−3π=12π
Multiply by the constant outside: 24⋅12π
Final Answer: 2π
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Fundamental Theorem & Properties of Definite Integrals
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, warriors of JEE! Today, we are not just solving an integral; we are peeling back the layers of a mathematical onion to reveal the elegant core hidden within.
Consider the problem:
48∫2234339−4x2dx
At first glance, it looks like a daunting expression. Imagine you are standing on the edge of a curve, and this integral is simply the area beneath it. Our goal is to find the exact value of that area.
The Algebraic Surgery
The first thing that should catch your eye is the denominator: 9−4x2. It screams for the standard inverse sine integral form:
∫a2−x2dx=sin−1(ax)+C
However, our formula demands that the coefficient of x2 be exactly 1. Currently, it is 4. We must perform some algebraic surgery.
We factor out the 4 from inside the square root:
9−4x2=4(49−x2)
When we pull that 4 out of the square root, it becomes a 2. Now, our integral transforms into:
48∫2(23)2−x2dx
Since 48 divided by 2 is 24, we have successfully tamed the expression, leaving us with:
24∫(23)2−x2dx
The Transformation
Now, we are in the home stretch. We apply the standard formula where a=23.
The integration yields:
24[sin−1(3/2x)]=24[sin−1(32x)]
This is the moment where the complexity vanishes. We are left with a simple inverse sine function evaluated over our specific limits.
The Final Act
Now, we substitute our limits. For the upper limit, x=433, the expression 32x becomes:
32⋅433=23
We know that sin−1(23)=3π.
For the lower limit, x=223, the expression 32x becomes:
32⋅223=21
We know that sin−1(21)=4π.
Finally, we calculate the difference:
24(3π−4π)=24(124π−3π)=24(12π)
The final result is a clean, elegant 2π. By staying calm and applying the standard forms, we arrived at a beautiful, simple answer.